![draconian crossword draconian crossword](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/54c5d2a7e4b0df35f166e6f8/1632001196718-GM8FWZ71WU16FOYT1YZ7/GUEST_9eaf9c95-b9a0-4e8f-8164-25bf10b9fbba.jpg)
![draconian crossword draconian crossword](https://www.realqunb.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/level155.jpeg)
![draconian crossword draconian crossword](https://images.hindustantimes.com/rf/image_size_630x354/HT/p2/2020/11/22/Pictures/google-photo-facebook-combination-photo-twitter-files_1e01b4b8-2cbe-11eb-a688-0f1acfc82532.jpg)
DRACONIAN CROSSWORD FREE
It also tells us to look at a deeper issue – how free are we as Indian citizens and how free do we want to be? Yes, but these are definitely a concern and they don’t help. One can, of course, argue that India’s poor rank is not only because of the marriage laws. Myanmar, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Iraq, Sudan, Yemen and Syria dominated the list between ranks 148 and 162. Syria raised no eyebrows for finishing last in the list of 162 countries. Pakistan finished 140th, and Bangladesh 138th. Jordan, ranked 80th, and Lebanon at the 88th spot, finished a few notches above India. Israel was the only exception, getting the 46th rank. These include rule of law, security and safety, movement, religious freedom, freedom of association, freedom of assembly and civil society, freedom of expression, freedom of identity and relationships among others.Īs expected, almost all the 29 countries did poorly on the index, not even making it to the top 75 ranks. Prepared by the Cato Institute in the US, Fraser Institute in Canada and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom in Germany, the researchers prepare the annual index on 78 parameters. The Human Freedom Index, 2019, released in December last year, listed New Zealand, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Canada and Australia as the top five freest jurisdictions in the world. It would perhaps be worthwhile to look at exactly where these 29 countries stand on overall freedom. In the process, India will be even more firmly ensconced in the exclusive club of love policemen. They will be prosecuted simply because they fell in love. But laws based on love jihad conspiracies may end up legally persecuting many interfaith couples. Laws are meant to protect people from persecution. The laws will add another layer of difficulty to the entire process, that many couples will never be able to pass. Now, with state governments getting involved, the concept of love jihad is in the process of getting legitimacy. The only saving grace was that the Special Marriage Act allowed interfaith couples to get married after creating roadblocks, like giving a 30-day notice to the marriage registrar and putting up the notice at a public place so that society at large comes to know that two consenting adults are taking the risk of crossing religious borders for love.īut, in the end, many still managed to marry despite pressure from their families and religious groups. Effectively, the world knew of India as a country averse to interfaith marriages even before Uttar Pradesh passed its ordinance. The names were predictable – Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, the UAE, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen …īut the list also had three countries that don’t belong to the Muslim world – India, Israel and Myanmar. Not surprisingly, 26 of these were Muslim-dominated countries, many of them infamous for tightly controlling individual liberty. It listed 29 countries that barred or restricted marriages between consenting adults of different faiths. In September 2015, when the Hadiya case had still not made headlines and love jihad was a fringe idea in mainstream Indian politics, the US Library of Congress released the ‘Prohibition of interfaith marriage’ report. This makes the case for India, which is a secular republic, more stark. Many of these countries have religion integrated into their Constitution. Ironically enough, the same laws may help India become a lifetime member of an exclusive club of Muslim-dominated countries, that consider it their moral responsibility to police love between interfaith couples. The so-called ‘love jihad’ laws that many Indian states hope to pass after Uttar Pradesh’s ordinance, aim to stop Muslim men from marrying Hindu women after converting them.